textual-notation-of-model/packages/features/aebs/aebs_degraded_input_verification.sysml
1 view(s) · 57 declared member(s) view source on GitHub
view aebs009FVerificationAssuranceView
| Viewpoint | selectedArgumentationAssuranceViewpoint (ArgumentationAssuranceViewpoint) |
|---|---|
| Concern | argumentationAssuranceConcern |
| Render | asTreeDiagram |
| Exposes | DE4SDV_AEBS009FVerification::* |
| Source | textual-notation-of-model/packages/features/aebs/aebs_degraded_input_verification.sysml:143 |
No committed diagram. Regenerate via the Privileged Syside Validation workflow (expected artifact
diagrams/diagram-aebs009FVerificationAssuranceView.svg).Source
1/* INC-AEBS-009F degraded/unavailable input matrix; planned System 2 executable contracts. */2package DE4SDV_AEBS009FVerification {3 private import VerificationCases::*;4 private import VerificationMethodKind::*;5 private import DE4SDV_AEBSNeedsRequirements::Features::AEBS::NeedsRequirements::*;6 private import SAF_Viewpoints::*;7 private import DE4SDV_Stakeholders::*;8 private import Views::*;91011 enum def ScenarioIdentity009F {12 staleInput;13 missingInput;14 malformedInput;15 inconsistentInput;16 unavailableInput;17 }18 enum def EvidenceOutcome009F {19 passBoundedDetection;20 failWrongDisposition;21 inconclusiveInstrumentation;22 errorEvidence;23 }24 item def Retained009FObservationSet;25 item def Replayed009FEvaluation {26 attribute scenario : ScenarioIdentity009F;27 attribute outcome : EvidenceOutcome009F;28 }29 calc def Map009FOutcomeToVerdict {30 in outcome : EvidenceOutcome009F;31 return verdict : VerdictKind =32 if outcome == EvidenceOutcome009F::passBoundedDetection? VerdictKind::pass33 else if outcome == EvidenceOutcome009F::failWrongDisposition? VerdictKind::fail34 else if outcome == EvidenceOutcome009F::errorEvidence? VerdictKind::error35 else VerdictKind::inconclusive;36 }3738 part def DegradedInputMatrixBench009F {39 attribute scenario : ScenarioIdentity009F;40 }41 requirement def EvidenceContract009F;42 requirement evidenceContract009FClosedInputHealthScenario : EvidenceContract009F {43 subject bench : DegradedInputMatrixBench009F;44 require constraint { doc /* The bench shall inject exactly one closed stale, missing, malformed, inconsistent, or unavailable input condition after any required healthy baseline. */ }45 }46 requirement evidenceContract009FStateOwnership : EvidenceContract009F {47 subject bench : DegradedInputMatrixBench009F;48 require constraint { doc /* The bench shall retain producer identity, affected topic, source timing, and ordered degraded-state transition and ownership observations. */ }49 }50 requirement evidenceContract009FStatusIndication : EvidenceContract009F {51 subject bench : DegradedInputMatrixBench009F;52 require constraint { doc /* The bench shall retain ordered AEBS status-indication observations for the bound input-health scenario. */ }53 }54 requirement evidenceContract009FObserverFailureIsNotPass : EvidenceContract009F {55 subject bench : DegradedInputMatrixBench009F;56 require constraint { doc /* The bench shall map missing, contradictory, contaminated, or unobservable evidence to inconclusive or error, never pass. */ }57 }5859 part staleInputBench009F : DegradedInputMatrixBench009F {60 attribute :>> scenario = ScenarioIdentity009F::staleInput;61 }62 part missingInputBench009F : DegradedInputMatrixBench009F {63 attribute :>> scenario = ScenarioIdentity009F::missingInput;64 }65 part malformedInputBench009F : DegradedInputMatrixBench009F {66 attribute :>> scenario = ScenarioIdentity009F::malformedInput;67 }68 part inconsistentInputBench009F : DegradedInputMatrixBench009F {69 attribute :>> scenario = ScenarioIdentity009F::inconsistentInput;70 }71 part unavailableInputBench009F : DegradedInputMatrixBench009F {72 attribute :>> scenario = ScenarioIdentity009F::unavailableInput;73 }7475 verification def DegradedUnavailableVerification009F {76 subject verifiedBench : DegradedInputMatrixBench009F;77 objective evidenceObjective009F {78 verify evidenceContract009FClosedInputHealthScenario;79 verify evidenceContract009FStateOwnership;80 verify evidenceContract009FStatusIndication;81 verify evidenceContract009FObserverFailureIsNotPass;82 }83 action collectData {84 @VerificationMethod{ kind = test; }85 out item retainedObservations : Retained009FObservationSet;86 }87 action processData {88 @VerificationMethod{ kind = analyze; }89 in scenarioIdentity : ScenarioIdentity009F = verifiedBench.scenario;90 in item retainedObservations : Retained009FObservationSet = collectData.retainedObservations;91 out item replayedEvaluation : Replayed009FEvaluation;92 }93 action evaluateData {94 @VerificationMethod{ kind = analyze; }95 in item replayedEvaluation : Replayed009FEvaluation = processData.replayedEvaluation;96 out verdict : VerdictKind = Map009FOutcomeToVerdict(replayedEvaluation.outcome);97 }98 return verdict : VerdictKind = evaluateData.verdict;99 }100 verification staleInputVerification009F : DegradedUnavailableVerification009F {101 @VerificationMethod{ kind = (test, analyze); }102 subject verifiedBench :> staleInputBench009F;103 }104 verification missingInputVerification009F : DegradedUnavailableVerification009F {105 @VerificationMethod{ kind = (test, analyze); }106 subject verifiedBench :> missingInputBench009F;107 }108 verification malformedInputVerification009F : DegradedUnavailableVerification009F {109 @VerificationMethod{ kind = (test, analyze); }110 subject verifiedBench :> malformedInputBench009F;111 }112 verification inconsistentInputVerification009F : DegradedUnavailableVerification009F {113 @VerificationMethod{ kind = (test, analyze); }114 subject verifiedBench :> inconsistentInputBench009F;115 }116 verification unavailableInputVerification009F : DegradedUnavailableVerification009F {117 @VerificationMethod{ kind = (test, analyze); }118 subject verifiedBench :> unavailableInputBench009F;119 }120 part verificationSystem009F {121 perform staleInputVerification009F;122 perform missingInputVerification009F;123 perform malformedInputVerification009F;124 perform inconsistentInputVerification009F;125 perform unavailableInputVerification009F;126 }127128 dependency degradedStateEvidenceRelevantToStateTransitionCandidate129 from evidenceContract009FStateOwnership to reqHandleDegradedUnavailableInputs;130 dependency degradedStatusEvidenceRelevantToStatusIndicationCandidate131 from evidenceContract009FStatusIndication to reqIndicateDegradedUnavailableStatus;132133 concern physicalStructureConcern : PhysicalStructureConcern {134 subject;135 stakeholder systemsEngineer : SystemsEngineer;136 stakeholder reviewer : OpenSourceReviewer;137 }138139 concern argumentationAssuranceConcern : ArgumentationAssuranceConcern {140 doc /* Evidence-based assurance claims and their supporting argumentation. */141 }142143 view aebs009FVerificationAssuranceView {144 viewpoint selectedArgumentationAssuranceViewpoint : ArgumentationAssuranceViewpoint {145 frame argumentationAssuranceConcern;146 }147148 expose DE4SDV_AEBS009FVerification::*;149 render asTreeDiagram;150 }151}152